BY TYLER DURDEN

SATURDAY, JUL 20, 2024

Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is set to address Congress at the invitation of Republicans on July 24. Several Democratic lawmakers have announced their intent to boycott the speech, citing what they say are ongoing human rights abuses and war crimes by the Israeli military (IDF) in Gaza.

Additionally, this week 230 anonymous staff members have signed a letter urging a Congressional protest or boycott. According to The Hill, this includes staff from Republican congressional offices as well... "across 122 Democratic and Republican offices," it says. The letter was organized by the Congressional Progressive Staff Association.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has put the body on notice, threatening to arrest anyone who is protesting or displaying unruly behavior. 

"There are a number of Democrats in the House who have said they’re going to boycott that event. Some others may protest," Johnsons told an audience of the Republican Jewish Coalition on the sidelines of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee earlier this week.

"We’re going to have extra sergeants at arms on the floor. If anybody gets out of hand… We’re going to arrest people if we have to do it," he added.

As for the Congressional Progressive Staff Association's letter, it reads as follows: 

“Citizens, students, and lawmakers across the country and the world have spoken out against the actions of Mr. Netanyahu in his War on Gaza,” the letter says.
“Israelis have been protesting in the streets for months, decrying his failure to negotiate a ceasefire and release of hostages. We hope you will join your fellow Members of Congress in protest at his speech or in refusing to attend it.”

There are some 100 members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus in the House and Senate, and the majority or even all of them are expected to boycott or possibly protest the speech. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the country's largest Muslim civil rights organization, have called on Congressional security officers to refuse Johnson's directive.

In the wake of Johnson's crackdown threat, some pundits have highlighted that he's a big recipient of funds from America's foremost Israeli lobby...

The perils of over-reliance on digital systems have been once again highlighted by the crashing of computer systems around the world due to an update to the Falcon antivirus and security product from CrowdStrike affecting its interaction with the Windows operating systems. The update has caused chaos for banking, retail, railways, airports, healthcare and for a wide range of other businesses and infrastructure where the Falcon software runs on Windows systems. Advice for bringing affected computers back into working order has been published, but the exact mechanism by which the update caused “Blue Screen of Death” errors does not appear to have yet been reported.

It appears that in many cases, while the update was distributed automatically over the internet to systems, the workaround to fix the problem requires the machines to be rebooted in Windows’ safe mode, which usually requires physical access. The person at the keyboard then needs to know the password for the computer’s administrator account, and use this level of access to delete a file within a subdirectory of Windows’ System32. This process can be more complicated where Microsoft’s BitLocker encryption is in use. In many organisations, the recovery keys for BitLocker have themselves been stored on a computer unable to start properly due to the CrowdStrike update. The quote “Men go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one”, originally from Charles Mackay in 1841, seems applicable now to computers too. They crash en masse, then require individual attention before they will work again.

It should be noted that while the perils of centralisation with a physical single point of failure are obvious to all but technocratic politicians and civil servants, this massive outage shows another way in which a “single point” of failure can occur. The single point in this case is not a particular server in one building somewhere on the planet; but rather a change within a single piece of software with that change then being rolled out to many individual systems around the globe. These systems then entered a state euphemistically described as Total Inability To Support Usual Performance (acronym intentional) among the tech community. There was a reason that NASA put a fifth backup flight computer in the space shuttle, running software written entirely independently of the software on its primary four computers. A single point of failure where software is concerned doesn’t have to happen at only a single point in space.

There is a very clear lesson to be learned here. Systems which can collapse at scale, even when they are not centralised in the physical sense, eventually will collapse in such a fashion. Advocates of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and Digital ID systems should consider these lessons. This update ‘only’ knocked out an estimated 8.5 million computers, belonging to over 24,000 organisations that subscribed to CrowdStrike’s Falcon software. A country reliant on a CBDC instead of cash would see an end to all transactions as a consequence of a similar failure affecting a component within whatever software stack was being used to operate CBDC infrastructure. That could mean a fault within the software on physically centralised or partly centralised servers logging transactions and holding records; or a fault within the software running on masses of devices operating as payment terminals in a wide variety of locations. In that dystopian CBDC-dependent nation, one would be looking at electric vehicles (already a bad idea simply on account of the abysmal energy density of batteries compared to chemical fuels) stranded at charging stations, unable to make payments to initiate the charging procedure. Consider that the World Economic Forum once advertised with slogans on the theme of “what if extreme weather froze your bank account”, right at the time when Justin Trudeau was freezing bank accounts on account of his extreme intolerance for peaceful protest. The reality is that in the centralised totalitarian model of society the WEF hungers for, this scenario becomes more probable, not less. That is to say, that as well as increasing the opportunities for censorship-obsessed elites to deliberately interfere in people’s lives, centralisation also increases the vulnerability of a society to accidental errors. Where Governments dream of requiring digital ID or age verification for internet access, or client-side scanning to look for objectionable opinions and only allow messages to be sent when approved as sufficiently “double plus good”, one can even imagine a situation where direct messages and online posts attempting to report a fault in the software stack running the verification or approval algorithms would be blocked from being sent. This wouldn’t need to be a matter of a deliberate attempt to cover up the fault, but instead the inability to report the fault would be a natural consequence of the fault itself. A censorship apparatus built on a principle of scanning everything before it can be shared ends up censoring absolutely everything if it is unable to perform scans.

 Where old systems, like cash, just work, the alternatives which Big Tech and Big Government claim are more convenient can collapse. Where computer systems you actually own and have true control over just work, systems which can be remotely updated can crash catastrophically. When Big Government pushes for things to be more “secure”, it usually has in mind intrusive projects to stop “bad people” from using “SMART” systems, rather than measures to actually make systems more resilient in the event of crises. Government, after all, tries to whip up anger against truly secure encryption by describing it as warrant-proof, though in an age where lawfare is becoming common and courts allow the monitoring of vast numbers of innocent people it is hard to see how such a level of protection is undesirable. Meanwhile, Big Tech companies seek to create an “experience” for users, which in practice comes to mean an ever more interlinked web of dependencies, often centred around a server to which the devices regularly phone-home to check that the user has the company’s permission to use the things they have bought. Concerningly, even farming has now become a field in which equipment manufacturers are displaying this ‘Big Tech’ attitude. This risks farmers’ livelihoods and entire nations’ food security in the event of software crashes. And that could include software crashes within Digital Rights Management subsystems of software which aren’t even there for the benefit of the user in the first place. 

Humans, when acting like machines and believing that adherence to procedure, policy, legislation or guidance is more important than common sense and morality, make the perils of centralisation still worse. If one adds a human element with a sufficiently jobsworth disposition and an absolute confidence in the infallibility of their systems to the toxic mix of centralisation and control freakery enabled by excessive digitisation, it results in horrific scenarios like those surrounding the Post Office’s Horizon software. I shall enter a little further into speculation here when suggesting that a correlation between people having problematic dispositions and a desire for centralisation may exist, perhaps best demonstrated by the ways in which I have seen the supporters and opponents of cash behaving during previous payment infrastructure outages. Contrast: the elderly woman who deposited exact change on the counter in a card-only cafe. She calmly claimed it was legal tender, whether that is an entirely applicable argument or not, and walked off with two packaged sandwiches. With: the student who upon being told, in broken English by the very polite man behind the fried-chicken shop counter, that VISA was down that day, raised his voice to a bellow. Such bellowing was perhaps difficult from behind the blue paper muzzle he was wearing in 2022. He then proceeded to accuse the owner of tax evasion in a lecture which lasted until everyone waiting around for their orders was glaring at him, and which contained expletives even someone fluent in English could be surprised by. While it is not my place to comment upon whether what the woman did was entirely legal, she gave the impression of someone who would start knitting socks for neighbours in a prolonged power-cut. The student gave the impression of someone who’d batter on doors in search of a USB powerbank with which to buy himself a while longer on TikTok. The types of people who cheer for centralisation do not appear to be the types who can foresee – much less aid in recovering society from – the consequences of centralisation-enabled failures.

Keeping to the theme of trendy people and trendy attitudes, it is also worth noting that whilst the update which led to the ongoing chaos may well have been intended as a security patch or as a bug fix for a rare software fault condition (and ended up creating a widespread one), many updates which have been responsible for widespread system failures in the past are updates to provide software with new ‘features’. Unfortunately, in keeping with trying to be fashionable brands, a lot more programming hours are dedicated to “oh, look, shiny” than to simply keeping abreast of actual functionality and security flaws which may require patching. With software controlled systems embedded in ever more places (and not all of this increase in the ubiquity of computing necessarily has to be bad so long as the systems are properly under a user’s control and are not cloud dependent), it would seem a wise time for the practice of software development to start prioritising reliability, resilience and stability. It would be wise to prioritise these above the aim of innovating in ways nobody asked for, which then disrupt people’s workflows within products they are already using. While consumer technology is particularly affected by this fashion-based philosophy, business software is not immune. This is particularly the case when buzzwords are used in efforts to market solutions to problems they might not have to bosses of limited technical expertise. Look at all the hype around AI, with its latest eruption coming in the form of Large Language Models. A world with software around every corner is a world which can’t afford that software to be updated, with the potential for introducing serious errors to it every time a corporate executive falls for a fad. The way in which smaller open source software projects operate may provide an inspiration here, particularly where the project consists of a standalone tool for a particular task. In many such projects, there are only two scenarios in which a developer typically posts an update. Firstly, he may post one in response to user reports of errors being thrown in specific circumstances. Secondly there may be a need for a new version of the tool when changes are needed to maintain compatibility with changes that have been applied to other software, such as new releases of an operating system under which the tool may be run.

As an overall picture, centralisation makes it all too easy for governments and corporations to feed their addiction to exercising control. And the further their reach spreads, the closer the state comes to being a black hole that sucks in the entirety of society and human experience, the more damage their anti-Midas touch causes. And then, in its aftermath, the solution they always push for is more centralisation, more opportunities to make things worse whether by intention or by accident. Escaping the headlong rush in to a new Soviet Union where nothing works and officialdom absolutely refuses to acknowledge the fact must be at the forefront of our minds when looking to the future. But the outage news itself can be summarised in a much shorter fashion. While one can feel sorry for those whose travel was disrupted, it is a wonderful feeling to jump to the front of a queue in a shop and pay a satisfied cashier with cash, whilst a seething mass of trendy woke-folk, who consider cash and even freedom itself to be outdated concepts, look on.

Dr. R P completed a robotics PhD during the global over-reaction to Covid. He spends his time with one eye on an oscilloscope, one hand on a soldering iron and one ear waiting for the latest bad new

For those asking “Why J.D. Vance?”:

Trump told us his logic with the announcement.

Currently, the tightest races are in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The Rust Belt states will decide the 2024 election.

Vance is from Ohio, and Trump told us in his announcement, that Vance’s job during the campaign will be to focus on winning over the hardworking people in these states.

Vance is a Midwest/Rust Belt guy, who hopefully can appeal to these voters, and put Trump over the top in these battleground states. That’s the thought process behind the pick.

Logically, it makes sense. Now we just have to make it work.

Good morning, happy C&Cers, it’s Saturday! And, oh, what a beautiful Saturday! It is, perhaps, the most glorious Supreme Court Saturday since, well, the Justices ruled that the little ‘prize’ at the bottom of a Cracker Jacks box was no prize at all, but actually mostly rubbish, and frankly a highly disappointing, BAD surprise, like a sticker that says “Cracker Jacks!” But I digress. Today’s outstanding roundup is packed with real prizes: The Biden Debate Disaster continued sinking into the Potomac River all day yesterday, with the United States’s political problems becoming even more fantastic and indescribable and causing our Allies to quietly start transferring their American chequing accounts to the Cayman Islands; no fewer than three Supreme Court blockbusters dropped, finally, and every one was terrific; and Oklahoma throws the Good Book at public schools in the most encouraging development of all.

🪖🪖 We begin with a moment of silence for one of our very favorite Representatives, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, 52, whose wife of 35 years, Rhonda, died suddenly on Thursday.  Rhonda was mother to their four children and earned a degree in mechanical engineering from MIT. We pray for the peace that surpasses all understanding for the Massie family.

🔥 We have wandered so far off the political map at this point that the boy scouts are crafting rough spears from local bamboo and starting to date the native women. Regardless of how our unprecedented and unimaginable political scenario ultimately plays out, Thursday’s debate will almost certainly become one of those global psychological demarcation points when the world changed forever in a single moment, like that time you ignored your wife’s advice and climbed the ladder to clean the gutters in your flip-flops. In other words, we will forever remember what the world was like before the Great Biden Debate Disaster, and marvel at how different it is now.

 At 6pm Eastern Standard time last night, the Editorial Board of the New York Times launched a journalistic SCUD missile at the Democrat’s presumptive nominee, eloquently headlined “To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race.” It began with the hysterical, hand-wringing claim that Democracy will Die if Trump gets re-elected. Since no weapon is off the table in the mission to “save Democracy” (for future drag queens), the Times’ Editors did the unthinkable and previously unforgivable: they called Democrat Resident Joe Biden unqualified for office: 

By Kevin Hughes

June 16, 2024

A new poll has found that immigration has become the top issue for potential voters this November and that a majority of Americans are in favor of mass deportation.

This is according to two recent polls, one conducted by Fox News and another conducted by Harvard University and market research firm The Harris Poll.

The Fox News poll was carried out by Braun Research, Inc. between March 22 and 25. The Harvard/Harris poll was conducted between March 20 and 21.

Respondents to the Fox News poll were first asked whether they approved or disapproved of so-called pResident Joe Biden's handling of immigration, and the results were not good for the fake incumbent.

Two-thirds of those surveyed, 67 percent, disapproved of Dementia Biden’s handling of immigration, compared to just 30 percent who were happy with the job the president is doing on the issue.

That 30 percent approval rating is Obama-Biden's lowest on the issue in the 35 months Fox News has been surveying this question; on the contrary, the 67 percent disapproval rating is the president's worst on immigration ever.

Meanwhile, the Harvard/Harris poll further cemented how immigration is the top issue for voters, with 36 percent of those surveyed noting how immigration is at the top of their concerns.

According to a new CBS News/YouGov poll, a strong majority of registered voters, as well as most Hispanics, would support a national program to deport illegal aliens from America.

The poll, published on Sunday, June 9, discovered that 62 percent of registered voter respondents would back "a new national program to deport all undocumented immigrants" that are currently residing illegally in the United States, while 38 percent of voters would oppose such a program.

A majority of 53 percent of Hispanics would support the deportation of illegal migrants altogether, while 47 percent would be against it. 

(Related: New poll shows rising Latino support for border wall, mass deportation of illegals.)

The majority of Republicans (88 percent) and independents (60 percent) would back a vast deportation effort, as would a considerable minority of Democrats (38 percent).

President Donald Trump, who is currently leading in national polls over OBiden, has been a strong proponent of a nationwide deportation program against illegal immigrants.

He has repeatedly vowed to carry out "the largest domestic deportation operation in American history" if re-elected.

Recently, during a campaign stop in Phoenix, Arizona, President Trump said he wants "deportation" of illegal aliens, while "Pedophile Biden wants an invasion."

The CBS News/YouGov poll further noted that, if a national deportation program came to fruition, most respondents would approve of local law enforcement units being empowered to track down and identify illegal immigrants in their communities.

Sixty-two percent said they would support "local police and law enforcement trying to identify which people were U.S. citizens, and which were undocumented immigrants."

A majority of independents (57 percent) and a supermajority of Republicans (84 percent) would be in favor of police being dispatched to identify illegal immigrants in the event of a national deportation operation.

Interestingly, nearly half of Democrats (45 percent) would also support this.

Follow BorderSecurity.news for more stories about the ongoing illegal immigration happening in America.

Watch the video below to know why mass deportations are needed now to stop America's Third World demographic demise.

Texan nationalists are coordinating with secessionist campaigners from five other states, who are also interested in breaking away from the United States, according to one of their leaders.

The claim was made by Daniel Miller, president of the pro-independence Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM), on the latest edition of his Late Night Coffee Talk online show that was broadcast on Facebook on June 19.

The past few months have seen a surge in activity from Texas independence campaigners, coinciding with heightened tensions between local authorities and the Biden administration over issues including illegal immigration and education. The Republican Party of Texas included support for an independence referendum in its 2024 Legislative Priorities and Platform document, which was released in June after this was approved by its convention in San Antonio the previous month. At the convention supporters of an independence referendum were also elected as the party's chair and vice-chair.

On Wednesday Miller was asked whether he supports other groups or states seceding from the U.S., to which he replied: "100 percent, but it's not that I support their seceding, it's that I support their right to have the discussion and have the vote and if that's what they want to do as a people then do so."

 Miller went on to claim the TNM has "interface" with independence movements in California, New Hampshire, Alaska, Florida and Louisiana.  

e said: "What we do is we work and communicate with independence movements. I mentioned several: Calexit, New Hampshire exit, the people in Florida which is going to be called Flexit I bet, Free Louisiana people, the Alaskan Independence Party."

Speaking to Newsweek about California, Alaska, Florida, Louisiana and New Hampshire Miller said: "A case can be made for a plausible path to independence for any of those states. As with all independence movements, current and historical, their 'exit' timeline expands and compresses depending on internal and external factors.

"California, Alaska, and New Hampshire have internal momentum that can be accelerated by a further deterioration of the relationship between the federal government and their people.

"Florida and Louisiana are newer [independence movements] but are already expressing political and legal resistance to federal overreach. Given the federal government's complete lack of a spirit of reform, if the gulf between their voters and federal policy continues to grow, their push to exit could accelerate greatly."

Whether or not Frank Zappa ever really said it, politics is indeed the entertainment division of the military industrial complex. It is the circenses of the panem et circenses, the circuses of the bread and circuses.

Audio and video here: https://davidswanson.org/talk-world-radio-the-coming-months-of-crazy

As we normalize genocide, increase the risk of nuclear war, lock in climate collapse, and accelerate the bioweapons tinkering that probably caused the covid pandemic, we are yet again presented with another most important election of our lifetime. Which geriatric sociopathic servant of the MICIMATT — the military industrial congressional intelligence media academia think tank complex — do you choose to identify with, deny all evidence against, and cheer for as a savior worthy of imperial powers no person should ever hold? Is it the guy who wants and has overseen massive increases in military spending, or the guy who wants and has overseen massive increases in military spending? Is it the guy who lied that he would end the war on Afghanistan or the guy who lied that there was some point evil enough at which he would end the war on Gaza? Is it the guy who badgers nations into buying more weapons or the guy who badgers nations into buying more weapons? Is it the guy who evicted Russian diplomats, sanctioned Russian officials, put missiles practically on Russia’s border, lobbied European nations to drop Russian energy deals, left the Iran agreement, tore up the INF Treaty, rejected Russia’s offers on banning weapons in space and banning cyberwar, expanded NATO eastward adding Montenegro as a member, added a NATO partner in Colombia, proposed adding Brazil, splurged on more nukes, bombed Russians in Syria, oversaw the largest war rehearsals in Europe in half a century (now outdone), condemned all proposals for a non-NATO European military, and insisted that Europe stick with NATO, or the guy who outdoes all of that, blocks peace deals for Ukraine, and claims the first guy is a servant of Russia?

 Kentucky Rep Thomas Massie (R) revealed to Tucker Carlson in an interview released Friday that every GOP congressman has an "AIPAC babysitter" who guides them on how to vote in the interests of Israel. 

Mark this most recent event as yet another piece of   evidence that Israel literally owns the U.S. Congress.

From Politico:

Netanyahu accepts   Congress’ invitation to speak despite blowback.

Tensions have been mounting in recent weeks after Speaker Mike Johnson announced his plan to invite Netanyahu to address Congress.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday accepted an invitation from congressional leaders to   address a joint session, a decision that has sparked tension within the  Democratic Party over Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza.

In a post to X, formerly known as   Twitter, Netanyahu wrote that he was looking forward to the opportunity to “present the truth” to Congress about the “just war” that   Israel has been waging in Gaza since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack, when 1,200  Israelis were killed and 240 others were taken hostage. In the months following Israel’s invasion of the Gaza Strip, at least 35,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to Palestinian health authorities, while millions of others have fled from   their homes.

“I am very moved to have the privilege of representing Israel before both Houses of Congress and to present the   truth about our just war against those who seek to destroy us to the representatives of the American people and the entire world,” Netanyahu wrote.

Tensions have been mounting in recent   weeks after Speaker Mike Johnson announced his plan to invite Netanyahu to address   Congress. The Democratic Party has splintered over U.S. support for Israel in   its ongoing war in Gaza, particularly after recent strikes in a designated safe zone for Palestinians   in the southern city of Rafah that reportedly killed at least 45 people.

Progressives, including Sen. Bernie   Sanders (I-Vt.), who has been outspoken in his disapproval of U.S. military support for Israel’s war, denounced the invitation.

“Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal.   He should not be invited to address a joint meeting of Congress. I certainly   will not attend,” Sanders wrote in a post to X.

Sanders also referenced the   International Criminal Court’s seeking arrest warrants for both Netanyahu and   Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar for alleged war crimes committed on both sides.

“The ICC is seeking warrants for the arrest of Netanyahu and Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas,” Sanders wrote.   “The ICC is right. Both of these people are engaged in clear and outrageous  violations of international law.”

Other lawmakers, including Rep. Hank  Johnson (D-Ga.), Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.)   have signaled that they would likely skip Netanyahu’s address.

Netanyahu’s upcoming address marks the   fourth time the leader will address a joint session of Congress, making him the first head of state to do so.

Mark this event as the king coming to receive his demanded homage from his loyal lords and knights that owe their positions of power to the king’s largess.

Only four members of Congress have thus far said   they would not attend the despicable display of disloyalty to their oaths of   office, the Bill of Rights and American freedomists from every quarter—and   not one of them is a Republican, thus proving what I said in this column last week that the Republican Party is 100%   controlled by the Israeli lobby. And no member of Congress is more fanatical   in his support of Zionist Israel than House Speaker Michael Johnson—who is a   faithful member of a Christian Zionist Southern Baptist Church.

We are to the point that sending evangelicals to  Congress is one of the worst things we can do when trying to protect  America’s liberties.

Senator Sanders spoke the truth:

Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal  He should not be invited to address a joint meeting of Congress.

The ICC [International Criminal Court]  is seeking warrants for the arrest of Netanyahu and Yahya Sinwar, the leader   of Hamas. The ICC is right. Both of these people are engaged in clear and  outrageous violations of international law.”

Inviting the Butcher of Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu,   to address Congress is tantamount to inviting Stalin, Hitler, Mao, or Pol Pot.

And this invitation to the Israeli mass murderer will be his fourth invitation to address Congress, making him the foreign   head of state to address the U.S. Congress more than any other. Winston   Churchill addressed the U.S. Congress three times.

What an ignoble indictment against our representatives (from both parties) in Washington, D.C.

Who could have ever dreamed that an uneducated   two-bit con man, thief, jailbird, family deserter, phony lawyer and preacher   could scribble some heretical notes between the pages of a Bible and utterly   expunge the historic truths of Christ’s New Covenant that had been faithfully proclaimed for 1,800 years of Church history from our country’s Protestant institutions and totally take over the entire governmental foreign policy of   the world’s most powerful nation—a nation founded by (mostly) Christian   people upon the Natural Laws of God—and turn it into an international warmongering machine that would result in the most bloodthirsty and murderous period of human history?

But that’s exactly what Cyrus Ingerson Scofield   did.

Considering these events, I strongly urge readers   to watch my message from last Sunday entitled Is God “Divorcing”   America?

Here is the YouTube link to that message.

Christian Zionism is cursing America. And   Christians are so indoctrinated in this antichrist theology that they are too   blind to see it; and they don’t even realize that they are helping to lead   America into global nuclear war. And Boy! Will they be surprised when no “Rapture” will save them.

So, when the mass murderer Benjamin Netanyahu comes   to Capitol Hill and evangelicals and members of Congress wave their little   Israeli flags, they may as well be waving the old Jolly Roger, the   pirates’ black flag with its Skull and Crossbones, because both flags are the   flags of murder and death.

© Chuck Baldwin

 Well-known trend forecaster Gerald Celente has warned that a false-flag event is going to make World War III official.

"WWIII has already begun. It's going to be a false flag event that's going to make it official," he said during a May 24 interview on the "Health Ranger Report" with the Health Ranger Mike Adams. "One of my sayings is 'When all else fails, they take you to war.'"

"What followed the Great Depression? World War II. What followed the dot-com bust? The War on Terror."

Celente cited the 39 weeks of protests in Israel that Israeli President Isaac Herzog described as the "civil war." Using the example above, the protests eventually led to the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas. Incidentally, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) had warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of the attack.

"So WWIII is going to … have a nuclear exchange. If [Israel loses] the war, they're going nuclear," Celente continued. "They have between 200 to 400 nuclear warheads – illegal, by the way. They could have them, but Iran can't or anybody else."

Adams meanwhile remarked that an Iranian lawmaker recently said Tehran has nuclear weapons. While the Islamic republic doesn't talk about its nuclear arsenal completely, it has nuclear weapon components hidden in a bunker and can assemble a nuclear weapon within a few hours.

He also noted that Israel is lowing the war against Hamas because Tel Aviv hasn't defeated the group. The IDF is also made up of hyper-privileged, weak soldiers compared to those who fought in WWII, the Brighteon.com and Natural News founder added. Adams ultimately agreed with his guest, predicting that Israel won't win the war and may end up using nuclear weapons out of sheer desperation.

Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Use our decentralized, blockchain-based, uncensorable free speech platform at Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions.

US Seizes Scott Ritter’s Passport
The RT News contributor was stopped from visiting Russia
6/3/24
The US State Department has seized the passport of former Marine and UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter, he told RT on Monday.
Ritter was on his way to Russia for the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) when he was pulled off the plane and had his documents confiscated.
“I was boarding the flight. Three [police] officers pulled me aside. They took my passport. When asked why, they said ‘orders of the State Department’. They had no further information for me,” Ritter told RT. “They pulled my bags off the plane, then escorted me out of the airport. They kept my passport.”
Ritter is a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer, who later served as the US and UN weapons inspector in Iraq. He is also a RT contributor, writing about international security, military affairs, Russia, and the Middle East, as well as arms control and nonproliferation.
He most recently visited Russia in January, spending time in Chechnya, Moscow and St. Petersburg, among other places.
The most recent post on Ritter’s Telegram channel put the Clooney Foundation for Justice on notice for its alleged crusade against “Russian propagandists.”
“Here I am. In your face. If telling the truth about Russia makes me a propagandist in your book, then I accept the title,” he wrote. “Bring it on. I’ll school you on the First Amendment.”
“You have zero concept of what free speech is. Try and arrest me and you’ll find out. In spades. It’s war,” he added.
Source:
https://www.rt.com/news/598711-us-seizes-scott-ritters-passport/
My comments:
The US is now the new communist, Bolshevik state where people are not allowed to leave under penalty of law.
The wealthy elite globalists are planning and forcing a war on Russia that will eventually go nuclear. The US government under the Biden regime, is constantly poking the Russian bear - trying to provoke it into attacking European and US targets. GE

EmailTwitterDiggRedditFacebook
 

 The Republican Party of Texas 2024 State Convention, which concluded last week, reaffirmed the growing momentum towards a call for a vote on Texas independence. Two significant planks emerged from the Permanent Platform Committee, reinforcing the Texas Nationalist Movement’s mission of political, cultural, and economic independence for Texas. 

A crucial plank centered on state sovereignty pursuant to Article 1, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution was put forward. This plank underscores the belief that the federal government has infringed upon Texans’ right to local self-government. The specific language of Plank 20 includes: